Flink is a Fintech Startup that seeks to democratize stock investments. With Flink users can invest in the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations (Nasdaq) shares with as little as 30 MXP to later sell their stocks at higher prices and make profits or dividends. They can also invest money in low-risk products and obtain daily returns with the savings account.
When I joined the company, the app was in the official store but was experiencing three challenges. The volume of daily transactions wasn´t increasing enough, the users didn’t have the best experience with the app, so they found it difficult to make investment decisions, and a high percentage of users left before completing the onboarding process.
In this case study, I will focus on the first and second challenges but will not address the third for privacy reasons.
We had 4 user personas defined, but to address the two challenges, we focused on two. Our user persona represents the 2 types of users that don't have extensive knowledge in investments but are risk takers.
Andrea is our younger user; she is looking for new ways to increase his legacy but she is not sure how to do it.
Bruno is our main user; he is young but his ambitious nature leads him to make rash decisions to get what he wants.
Flink's mission is to become the favorite investment application and the easiest to use. it is important for customers to easily find stocks and understand the information needed to make good investment decisions. As the catalog and the information continued increasing, it became evident that the volume of information overwhelmed users. So, the mission of bringing users closer to investments is not being fulfilled.
Based on this assumption, we conducted deep-dive interviews with 14 participants to understand pain points and areas of opportunity and define what actions to take.
Important needs to come out of this user testing included:
With all of the above in mind, the challenges and objectives were adjusted to solve both the needs of the user and the business, so the design and product teams paired up to to discuss ideas and proposals to solve our challenges:
After rank our proposals, our technical constraints and the user experience that we want to offer, we agreed on prioritize two features:
Ideating was done in three parts:
We used this session to explore different design proposals and conduct a deeper analysis of the best ideas to choose one to take forward into further exploration.
We worked on low-fidelity wireframes based on the most highly-rated idea; then, we did usability tests with 6 users to test our hypothesis and our design.
After analyzing the results, we moved on to high-fidelity wireframes using our Design System: Enchiridion.
The first proposal to help users make better investment decisions was a small but complex section in the stock detail view. In this section we suggested actions to take, based on expert opinion accompanied by analysis and related graphs. This strategy helped users and, at the same time, it helps increase the number of daily transactions.
The second proposal focused on increasing the buying and selling of shares without impacking the user experience. This proposal offers users the option to create combos of shares, which can be shared by expert users and purchased by others.
The next steps are to track the average daily purchases and sales and the average per purchase-sale ticket. In addition to survey users to find out more about their experience on the "Analysts recommend" section and its usefulness in their investment decision-making.
© 2022 Brenda González Ortega - All rights reserved.